Case study 01
Client workBorrowed Blues
From “how do I know it’s working?” to a clear path through therapy.
Read the full case study (opens in a new tab)
How the project ran
-
01Diagnose
Anushka came with practical needs, not a crisis. She wanted easier scheduling, to stop repeating the same questions on every discovery call, and a way to manage ongoing clients and keep continuity between sessions.
We agreed the scope: an online practice for one therapist that makes starting therapy, and continuing it, easy to understand. Not a marketplace, and not a general wellness app.
-
02Investigate
I interviewed Anushka and three of her clients, and reviewed four comparable services: a London clinic, a Mumbai practice, a large Indian platform and a mood-tracking app.
The uncertainty didn't sit before therapy. It sat inside it: is this helping, can I see progress without extra work, and can I afford to keep going? Every service I reviewed was English-only, and most explained therapy in clinical terms.
“Therapy takes time, but how do I know it’s working?”
A client, in interview “I think progress tracking would help… but I don’t want to be the one doing it.”
A client, in interview Three interviews point the way. They don't prove it.
-
04Evaluate
Four of my assumptions didn't survive the research.
- I assumed hesitant people wanted a slower start. They wanted one they could understand. One participant corrected me, and it changed what the intake had to do.
- I assumed progress tracking meant clients logging their moods. They wanted to see progress without doing the tracking.
- I assumed the hard part was finding a therapist. It starts after they've found one.
- I assumed the therapist's needs and her clients' needs were separate. Two of them are the same need, seen from either side: her repeated discovery-call questions are the other side of clients not knowing what to expect.
-
05Recommend
Build first where the two lists overlap. A staged intake and a “what to expect” guide for session one. Then a space between sessions where the therapist carries the progress: a summary, homework and resources in each client's own account, with no journal to keep. Anushka reviewed every feature and approves every summary.
Two things I said no to. Therapist matching: big platforms lead with it, but her clients' problem started after they'd found someone. A mood-tracking app: the obvious answer to “show me progress”, but it puts the work back on the client.
Before calling any of it proven, I'd test the revised intake with five people new to therapy, run a security and privacy review, since the platform holds sensitive client information, and widen the research beyond three interviews. Language is still open: the site is English-only, though participants named language and family perception as barriers.
What was built
The platform is live. The home page names the fear directly, that starting therapy can feel overwhelming, and a guide walks through session one step by step. It uses plain words throughout, with no method names or clinical terms.
Each client has an account, created by the therapist, where session summaries, homework and resources wait for them. A visual progress journey is in progress. Sessions run on Google Meet, with the link emailed automatically.
Fees are published on the site: ₹1,000 a session, or ₹700 on a sliding scale for students and people from marginalised communities. It answers “can I afford this?” before anyone has to ask.
Want this for your brand?
A free 20-minute call to see which project fits, if any.
Not ready to talk? Send a short note
Pick a time
Thanks, I'll reply by email.